An oral order wherein the High Court disposed of the appeal as withdrawn because the appellant had preferred another appeal (CRA-D-51 of 2021) which was already admitted.
Appeal disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (PROCEEDIGNS THROUGH V.C.)
CRA-D-153 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 05.07.2021
Chandan
...Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR VERMA
Present:- Mr. J.P. Jangu, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the appellant, in the light of the fact that another appeal has already been preferred by the appellant i.e. CRA-D-51 of 2021 which stands already admitted vide order dated 15.02.2021, prays for withdrawal of this appeal.
Disposed of as withdrawn.
(Augustine George Masih) Judge
(Ashok Kumar Verma) July 05, 2021 Judge R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2021.07.05 13:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Chandan
State of Haryana
Augustine George Masih
Ashok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
