The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel did not appear. All pending miscellaneous applications were disposed of accordingly.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; pending applications disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT ASHOK KUMAR
2021.10.14 10:43 CHANDIGARH I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 225 CR-8402-2017 Date of decision: 13.10.2021 ARUN KUMAR ..Petitioner Versus KRISHNA DEVI ..Respondent CR-8412-2017 ARUN KUMAR ..Petitioner Versus VISHAL AND ANR. ..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Naresh Jain, Advocate for the respondents. ***
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J (Oral)
Called twice. However, learned counsel for the petitioner did not
appear to attend the hearing.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
All the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, are also
disposed of.
13.10.2021 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) ashok JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
ARUN KUMAR
KRISHNA DEVI
ANIL KSHETARPAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
