Mulkh Raj v. Sukhdev Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
206 (2nd case)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-839-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.12.2021
Mulkh Raj
...Petitioner
Versus
Sukhdev Singh
…Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present : Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent. (Presence marked through video conference)
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner-landlord submits that since
the connected civil revision No.825-2021 is allowed vide an order of even
date, the instant civil revision is rendered infructuous.
Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
03.12. 2021 (ARUN MONGA) vandana JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SHALINI BHATIA 2022.01.17 02:24 I attest to the accuracy of this order
Mulkh Raj
Sukhdev Singh
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court