Mubarik Khan v. Deepak Gahlawat
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-618-2021 Date of Decision: 22.04.2021
Mubarik Khan
......Petitioner
Versus
Deepak Gahlawat
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU Present: Mr. Farukh Abdullah, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pankaj Midha, Addl. AG, Haryana.
HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, J
Petitioner had filed a petition bearing CRM-M-25341-2019, which was disposed of vide order dated 31.05.2019 passed by this Court directing respondent No. 2-Superintendent of Police, Palwal to look into the matter and dispose of representation P-2 expeditiously.
The claim of the petitioner in the said representation is that two accused namely Tahir and Jubaid, who were declared as proclaimed offenders in case registered under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, were not being arrested by the Police.
Compliance report on behalf of the respondent has been filed wherein it has been stated that accused Jubaid has been arrested on 14.04.2021. It is stated that accused Tahir is evading arrest but efforts are being made to nab him.
In these circumstances, present petition has become infructuous and the same is disposed of as such.
April 22, 2021 (Harinder Singh Sidhu) manoj Judge Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
MANOJ KUMAR 2021.04.23 09:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Mubarik Khan
Deepak Gahlawat
Harinder Singh Sidhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court