A writ petition challenging monetary benefits was dismissed as infructuous since the respondent confirmed that all benefits had been released.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.2817 of 2020 Date of Decision: 27.01.2021
Sukhwinder Singh & Ors.
......Petitioners
Versus
Sh. Nitish Singla
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Present: Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ankit Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Anupam Bansal, Advocate for the respondent.
HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, J
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that respondents have filed an affidavit dated 25.01.2021 and in the light of same, all the monetary benefits have been released to the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the said
fact.
In view thereof, present petition is disposed of as infructuous.
January 27, 2021 manoj
(Harinder Singh Sidhu) Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
MANOJ KUMAR 2021.02.01 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sukhwinder Singh
Sh. Nitish Singla
HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
