Petitioner's petition declaring the matter infructuous after pension re-fixation and payment was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.2355 of 2020 Date of Decision: 14.01.2021
Satpaul Goyal
......Petitioner
Versus
Sukhjitpal Singh and Ors.
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Present: Mr. Ashish Goklaney, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aditya Sharda, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. H.S. Jugait, Advocate for respondent No.2.
HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, J
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that pension has been re-fixed and the necessary payment has been released to the petitioner thereby rendering the present petition as infructuous.
Disposed of as such.
January 14, 2021 (Harinder Singh Sidhu) manoj Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
MANOJ KUMAR 2021.01.15 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Satpaul Goyal
Sukhjitpal Singh and Ors.
Harinder Singh Sidhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
