Sudesh Bajaj v. Krishan Kumar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this COCP, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a petition challenging a 33% pension cut imposed on the petitioner. Relying on a prior quashing order, the Court directed the respondent to reconsider the punishment keeping in view similar minor punishments for other employees.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent No. 1 to reconsider the penalty of 33% pension cut and pass an appropriate order within one month, considering punishments for similarly placed employees.