The High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the Competent Authority had already passed a speaking order deciding the petitioners' legal notice in compliance with a prior interim order.
Present petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.124 of 2021 Date of Decision: 19.01.2021
Rajveer and Ors.
......Petitioners
Versus
S.N Rai, Commissioner and Secretary, Local Govt, Deptt, Haryana etc
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU Present: Mr. S.K Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, J
Sh. Tapan Kumar, DAG Haryana appearing on behalf of
respondent-State submits that in compliance of order dated 26.08.2020
passed by this Court in CWP No.11947 of 2020, a speaking order dated 14.01.2021 has been passed by the Competent Authority whereby legal notice submitted by the petitioners has since been decided.
In view thereof, present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
January 19, 2021 manoj
(Harinder Singh Sidhu) Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
MANOJ KUMAR 2021.01.21 09:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Rajveer and Ors.
S.N Rai, Commissioner and Secretary, Local Govt, Deptt, Haryana etc
HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
