In RSA No. 730 of 2005, the Punjab & Haryana High Court discontinued the appellant's appeal for default in appearance. Despite multiple adjournments, Balbir Singh failed to appear on the final hearing date, leading the court to presume lack of interest.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No. 730 of 2005 (O&M) Date of decision : February 26, 2020
Balbir Singh
....Appellant
versus
Harbans Singh
....Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh
Present : None
Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral)
Inspite of repeated pass overs, none has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant, which was the situation even on the last date of hearing, impels this Court to hold that the appellant appears to be not interested in pursuing this matter.
Dismissed for non prosecution.
( Fateh Deep Singh ) February 26, 2020 Judge 'tiwana'
Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Whether Reportable ? Yes/No
DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2020.03.03 11:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Balbir Singh
Harbans Singh
Fateh Deep Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
