The single judge dismissed the appeal filed by Punjab National Bank due to non-prosecution, noting the absence of the appellant's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No. 1617 of 1990 (O&M) Date of decision : February 11, 2020
Punjab National Bank
....Appellant
versus
M/s Prithvi Industries Bathinda and others
....Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh
Present : None for the appellants
Mr. Ankush Singla, Advocate, for the respondents
Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral)
In spite of repeated pass overs and even post lunch, none has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( Fateh Deep Singh ) February 11, 2020 Judge 'tiwana'
Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Whether Reportable ? Yes/No
DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2020.02.14 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Punjab National Bank
M/s Prithvi Industries Bathinda and others
Fateh Deep Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
