The High Court dismissed the criminal appeal solely for want of prosecution, as the appellants failed to appear, neither their counsel nor required process fees were provided, preventing the supply of appeal copies.
none
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SHIVANI GUPTA 2020.01.07 14:05
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No. 4219 of 2018 (O & M) Date of decision: 06.01.2020
Parveen Raja and others
....Appellant(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: None for the appellants. G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
Case has been called twice, however, none has put in appearance on behalf of the appellants. Notices could not be issued to the respondents for want of process fee. Even on the last two occasions, arguing counsel for the appellants was not available. In the absence of the counsel for the appellants, even copies of the appeal cannot be supplied to counsel for the State.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
06.01.2020 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Parveen Raja and others
State of Haryana and others
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
