The appeal is dismissed by reference to a detailed judgment passed on the same date in a related revision application. No substantive orders, reasoning, or specific relief are detailed in this short order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.3825 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision:08.01.2020
Hanuman
....Appellant(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others
....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. R.P. Verma, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Sharma, Advocate, for the landowners. Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Addl. AG, Haryana, Ms. Vibha Tiwari, AAG, Haryana.
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
The appeal is dismissed in terms of the detailed judgment of even
date passed in RFA No.4247 of 2016 titled as “ State of Haryana and others
Vs. Bhup Singh .”
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) 08.01.2020 JUDGE Parveen Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PARVEEN KUMAR 2020.01.20 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc
Hanuman and others
State of Haryana and others
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
