The High Court of Punjab and Haryana, in an oral order, remanded this appeal for a fresh decision in accordance with a detailed judgment passed even date in a connected matter involving the Nuclear Power Corporation.
The appeal was remanded for a fresh decision based on a connected judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.1887 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision:23.01.2020
Sant Kumar
....Appellant(s)
Versus
The State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Sunil K. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Ashok Verma, Advocate, Mr. Ashok Arora, Advocate, Mr. Deepak Choudhary, Advocate, Mr. Radhey Shyam Sharma, Advocate, for the landowners.
Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Additional AG, Haryana, Ms. Vibha Tiwari, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Aashish Chopra, Advocate and Mr. Gagandeep Singh, Advocate, for the Nuclear Power Corporation.
Mr. Manpreet Ghuman, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate for the respondent-HPGCL.
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
The appeal is remanded for fresh decision in terms of detailed
judgment of even date passed in RFA No.1285 of 2016 titled as “Chief Project
Engineer (now Chief Construction Engineer) Nuclear Power Corporation
of India Ltd. Vs. Shamsher Singh and others” .
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) 23.01.2020 JUDGE Parveen Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PARVEEN KUMAR 2020.01.30 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc
Sant Kumar
The State of Haryana
G.S. Sandhawalija
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
