The appeal was allowed in terms of a detailed judgment passed in a related revision application filed on the same date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.1515 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision:31.01.2020
Shanti Devi
....Appellant(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and another ....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Shoaib Khan, Advocate, Mr. Manoj Khan Chouhan, Advocate, Mr. S.K. Laura, Advocate, Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate for Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Ram Kumar Saini, Advocate, Mr. Nitin Rathee, Advocate, Mr. Gopal Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Gopal Soni, Advocate, Mr. Anil Kumar Malik, Advocate, Mr. SPS Ahulawalia, Advocate for Mr. Akshay Jindal, Advocate, Mr. Mohit Jaggi, Advocate, Mr. Arvind Kashyap, Advocate, Mr. P.C. Yadav, Advocate, Mr. Gobind Rana, Advocate for Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate, Mr. Gobind Dhanda, Advocate, Mr. Rajiv Kataria, Advocate and Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate, for the landowners.
Ms. Aruna Sachdeva, appellant in person in RFA-3490-2014.
Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Additional AG, Haryana, Mr. Abhinash Jain, AAG, Haryana. Ms. Vibha Tiwari, AAG, Haryana.
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J.
The appeal is allowed in terms of detailed judgment of even date
passed in RFA No.1253 of 2014 titled as “Ranbir Singh and others Vs. State
of Haryana and others” .
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) 31.01.2020 JUDGE Parveen Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PARVEEN KUMAR 2020.02.04 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc
Shanti Devi
State of Haryana
another
G.S. Sandhwalia
Parveen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
