This order dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as the appellants repeatedly failed to appear and the court presumed they were not interested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No. 7655 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision : January 21, 2020
Nanhi Devi and others
....Appellants
versus
Union of India
....Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh
Present : None for the appellants
Mr. Yogesh Kumar Saini, Advocate, for the respondent
Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral)
Inspite of repeated pass overs, none has put in appearance on behalf of the appellants, which was the situation even on the last two dates of hearing, impels this Court to hold that the appellants appear to be not interested in pursuing this matter.
Dismissed for non prosecution.
January 21, 2020 'tiwana'
( Fateh Deep Singh ) Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Whether Reportable ? Yes/No
DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2020.01.23 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Nanhi Devi and others
Union of India
Fateh Deep Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
