The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution after the appellant and its counsel failed to appear despite repeated adjournments, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No. 359 of 2000 (O&M) Date of decision : March 05, 2020
Union of India
....Appellant
versus
Mohammad Assadulah War
....Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh
Present : None
Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral)
Inspite of repeated pass overs, none has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant even post lunch, which was the situation even on the last date of hearing, impels this Court to hold that neither the appellant nor its counsel appears to be not interested in pursuing this matter.
Dismissed for non prosecution.
( Fateh Deep Singh ) March 05, 2020 Judge 'tiwana'
Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Whether Reportable ? Yes/No
DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2020.03.06 11:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Union of India
Mohammad Assadulah War
Fateh Deep Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
