Disposed
Nawal Kishore Sharma v. Union Bank of India and Others
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/9816/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
210
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 9816 of 2020 Date of Decision: 6th August, 2020
Nawal Kishore Sharma
Petitioner
Versus
Union Bank of India and another
Respondents
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present : Mr. N.K. Verma, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Amit Rishi, Advocate for the Respondents.
Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.
law.
[S. MURALIDHAR] JUDGE
[AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE
6th August, 2020 pankaj baweja
Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
PANKAJ BAWEJA 2020.08.06 04:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Sector-1, Chandigarh
Nawal Kishore Sharma
Union Bank of India
S. Muralidhar
Avneesh Jhingan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court