Raveen Raj v. Central Board of Secondary Education and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ANKUR GOYAL 2020.02.19 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA authenticity of this document AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.125 CWP No.3972 of 2020 DATE OF DECISION: February 19, 2020
RAVEEN RAJ
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION (CBSE), DELHI AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL
Present: Mr. Sandeep Goyat, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Kannan Malik, Advocate, for respondent CBSE.
SUDHIR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for CBSE on instructions submits that a candidate appearing as a private candidate is not handicapped in any manner in seeking admission to an under-graduate course. Since, the sponsorship of the petitioner was received beyond the cut of date, he is being reflected as a private candidate. Examinations are commencing w.e.f. 24.02.2020 and thus, at this late stage, the record cannot be corrected.
Thus, the petitioner cannot be granted any relief.
The writ petition is dismissed.
February 19, 2020 (SUDHIR MITTAL) Ankur JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
51
RAVEEN RAJ
CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION (CBSE), DELHI
SUDHIR MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court