In a single-line order dated 09.01.2020, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana declared the writ petition infructuous after respondents deposited compensation and referred the matter for deciding party title, thereby granting the primary relief sought.
The writ petition declared infructuous and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SHIVANI GUPTA 2020.01.10 10:34
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 13463 of 2018 Date of decision: 09.01.2020
Niranjan Singh and others
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
UOI and others
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Kanica Sachdeva, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Kunal Thapa, Advocate, for Mr. R.S. Madan, Advocate, for respondent no. 3-NHAI.
Mr. Simranjit Singh, Advocate, for Mr. H.S. Dhandi, Advocate, for respondent no. 7.
G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
Reply on behalf of respondents no. 4 and 5 has been filed. It has been averred that the matter has been referred to the District Judge, SAS Nagar on 28.08.2018 for deciding the title of the parties as per Annexure R- 4/1. The amount of compensation of Rs.61,05,611/- has been also deposited in the shape of FDR in the Kotak Mahindra Bank and the FDR has been attached as Annexure R-4/2.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the above, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous as primary relief has been granted.
Ordered accordingly.
09.01.2020 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Niranjan Singh
UOI
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
