Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a petition after information indicated the alleged detainee preferred not to accompany him and lived with parents voluntarily. The court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
230
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
-.-
CRWP-8532-2020 (O&M)
Date of decision : 18.11.2020.
Abhinavdeep
.....Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana and Others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present: Mr. Balkar Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Dimple Jain, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Sandeep Singh Jattan, Advocate, for private respondents.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
Heard through video conferencing.
A short report has been filed pursuant to the order dated 15.10.2020, wherein it has been stated that the alleged detenue Komal Chaudhary does not want to accompany the petitioner and she is living with her parents voluntarily.
Faced with the same, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw the present petition.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
November 18, 2020 (ALKA SARIN) tripti JUDGE
NOTE:
Whether speaking/non-speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
TRIPTI SAINI 2020.11.19 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Abhinavdeep
State of Haryana
Others
Alka Sarin
Tripti Saini
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
