Disposed

Fauji Kevet v. State of Haryana of Others

Punjab & Haryana HC6 Jul 2020CRWP/4571/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking release of persons alleged to be bonded labourers. The bench relied on a Division Bench precedent and directed the District Magistrate to treat the petition as a complaint under the Bonded Labour System Act and take action within one week.

What did the court decide?

Direction to District Magistrate, Panipat to treat the petition as a complaint under the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 and take action within one week.

Fauji Kevet Vs State of Haryana of… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Punjab & Haryana HC (2020)

¶1

CRWP No. 4571 of 2020

¶2

-1-

¶3

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

¶4

Criminal Writ Petition No. 4571 of 2020 Date of Decision: 06.7.2020

Fauji Kevet

......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

¶10

Present: Mr. Aditya Partap Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

¶12

HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J. (ORAL)

¶13

Case is being taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

¶14

This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing official respondents to get the dentenues, mentioned in para No. 2 of the petition, released from the illegal detention of private respondents.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner has restricted his prayer to the extent that the present petition be disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to treat this petition as a complaint under the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 and take immediate action in accordance with law within a stipulated period.

¶16

A Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 32 of 2013 , titled

¶17

' Murti versus The State of Punjab and others' , has held as under:

¶18

“It may be mentioned here that the allegations of the appellant in the writ petition are that the alleged detenues mentioned in para No.3 of the writ petition who are

¶19

GURPREET SINGH 2020.07.06 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chadigarh

¶20

CRWP No. 4571 of 2020

¶21

-2-

¶22

working as labourers at the brick kiln of respondent Nos. 4 & 5 are being kept as bonded labours. There can indeed be no doubt that if a labourer has been detained as bonded labour, it amounts to an offence under Sections 16 & 17 of the Bonded Labour (Abolition) Act, 1976. We, however, clarify that the aforesaid observation does not mean that the allegations levelled by the appellant have been accepted. Suffice it to observe that under the Act, the District Magistrate is under statutory obligation to hold a fact finding enquiry as and when a complaint alleging violation of the provisions of Bonded Labour (Abolition) Act, 1976 is received. Since the appellant in the instant case has specifically averred that the persons mentioned in para No.3 of the writ petition have been detained as bonded labourers, we allow this appeal and setaside/modify the order dated 9.1.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge to the extent that the petitioner's writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate, Sangrur, to treat this writ petition as a complaint under the 1976 Act and take immediate action in accordance with law, within a period of one week from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order alongwith a copy of the writ petition.”

¶23

Accordingly, this Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to District Magistrate, Panipat to treat this petition as a complaint under the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 and take immediate action in accordance with law, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition.

¶24

(HARNARESH SINGH GILL) JUDGE July 06, 2020 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶25

GURPREET SINGH 2020.07.06 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chadigarh

Fauji Kevet v. State of Haryana of Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fauji Kevet v. State of Haryana of Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amrit Lal etc. Vs Kewal Krishan

Dinesh Kumar @ Binny Vs State of Union Territory Chandigarh

Jagdish Chand Vs State of Haryana

Tilak Raj Shastri @ Tushar Sharma Vs State of Haryana

Raj Kumar @ Raju Vs State of Haryana

Kavita and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others