Nadeem @ Naseem v. State of Punjab and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-369-2020
Date of Decision: 25.02.2020
Nadeem @ Naseem
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: - None for the petitioner.
Mr. Pawan Sharda, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Despite the case having been called twice the petitioner has gone un-represented.
By filing reply by way of affidavit of Sh. Balkar Singh, Superintendent, Central Jail, Gurdaspur, learned State counsel submits that petitioner expired on 08.02.2020. Reply is taken on record. Be tagged at the appropriate place.
In view of above, the instant criminal writ petition is
dismissed for want of prosecution.
February 25, 2020 (RAMENDRA JAIN) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2020.02.26 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Nadeem @ Naseem
State of Punjab
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court