The single-judge oral order permitted the withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file an appropriate application in the trial court after recording the complainant's statement.
Withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file an appropriate application in the trial Court after recording the statement of the complainant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR No. 170 of 2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 19.2.2020
Amarjit Kaur
................Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab and another
.................Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan
Present: Mr. L.S. Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner
H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file appropriate application in the trial Court after statement of the complainant is recorded.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
( H.S. Madaan ) 19.2.2020 Judge
chugh
Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No
Whether reportable Yes / No
BANITA CHUGH 2020.02.19 13:56 I am the author of this document
Amarjit Kaur
State of Punjab and another
H. S. Madaan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
