Dismissed
Jagroop Singh and Another v. State of Punjab
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/8597/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2020 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND…
What the court decided
AI extract
of 2020 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-8597 of 2020 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-8597 of 2020 Date of decision:25.09.2020
Jagroop Singh and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. A.P.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Monika Jalota, DAG, Punjab
HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J. (ORAL)
Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.
Through this petition, the petitioners seek quashing of orders dated 04.09.2019 and 01.05.2019 passed by Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ajnala, whereby petitioners No.1 & 2 were declared proclaimed offender in case FIR No.47 dated 05.05.2018 registered under Sections 307,364,148,149 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, at Police Station Ramdas, District Amritsar Rural.
Vide order dated 28.02.2020 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, both the petitioners i.e. Jagroop Singh and Joga Singh were directed to surrender before the trial Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that Jagroop Singhpetitioner No.1 surrendered before the trial Court but Joga Singh-petitioner
ISHWAR SINGH 2020.09.25 04:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-8597 of 2020 -2-
No.2 did not surrender before the trial Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioners further states that since Joga Singh-petitioner No.2 has not complied with order dated 28.02.2020, therefore, he is not pressing the present petition qua Joga Singh-petitioner No.2 and prays that the same may be dismissed qua him.
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous qua petitioner No.1-Jagroop Singh, whereas qua petitioner No.2-Joga Singh, the same is dismissed as not pressed.
25.09.2020 (HARNARESH SINGH GILL) ishwar JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No
ISHWAR SINGH 2020.09.25 04:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Jagroop Singh
Joga Singh
State of Punjab
Harnaresh Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court