Dismissed

Sukhmander Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC18 Sept 2020CRM-M/8077/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking directions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The High Court held the petition infructuous as a cross-case had already been registered against the private respondents and a challan presented. Additionally, an SC/ST complaint was filed. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

What did the court decide?

The petition was held infructuous and disposed of. No specific interim relief against respondents 1 and 2 was granted.

Sukhmander Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others — Quashing and FIR | Punjab & Haryana HC (2020)

¶1

CRM-M No. 8077 of 2019

¶2

-1-

¶3

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

¶4

CRM-M No. 8077 of 2019 Date of Decision: 18.9.2020

Sukhmander Singh

......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

¶10

Present: Mr. N.S.Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. N.K.Banka, DAG, Punjab.

¶12

Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for respondents No. 6 to 9.

¶13

¶14

HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J. (ORAL)

¶15

Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

¶16

This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No. 1 and 2 for directing their subordinates i.e. respondents No. 4 and 5 to proceed with the investigation of the matter by taking into consideration Annexure P-5 and to lodge cross-case against the private respondents i.e. respondents No. 6 to 9.

¶17

Learned counsel for respondents No. 6 to 9 submits that this petition has become infructuous as the cross-case had been registered against the private respondents i.e. respondents No. 6 to 9 and other coaccused under Sections 323, 324, 148, 149 IPC vide General Diary No. 23 dated 24.9.2018, P.S. GRP, Ferozepur and challan has already been

¶18

presented in the Court.

¶19

GURPREET SINGH 2020.09.18 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chadigarh

¶20

CRM-M No. 8077 of 2019

¶21

-2-

¶22

In the present case, cross-case has been registered against respondents No. 6 to 9 and challan has also been presented in the Court. So far as SC/ST Act is concerned, a complaint under the SC/ST (Annexure R-6/1) has also been filed by Pritam Kaur, who is one of the accused and has been found innocent.

¶23

Keeping in view the above, the present petition becomes infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.

¶24

(HARNARESH SINGH GILL) JUDGE September 18, 2020 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶25

GURPREET SINGH 2020.09.18 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chadigarh

Sukhmander Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sukhmander Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mamta and Others Vs State of Haryana and Another

Paramjit Singh @ Pamma Vs State of Punjab

Dishant Goel Vs U.T. of Chandigarh

Suresh Kumar Vs State of Punjab

Jaswant Singh Vs State of Punjab

Daulat Singh @ Dauli Vs State of Punjab