A single-bench order allowing a prayer to prepone the hearing date for the main bail petition and dismissing the present application after the petitioner withdrew it in view of the Court's inclination to deny bail.
Prayer to prepone hearing date allowed; petition in CRM-M No.783 of 2020 dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CASE HEARD THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING
102 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.24752 of 2020 IN/AND CRM-M No.783 of 2020 (O&M) Decided on: 14.10.2020
Chhinder @ Chhindri @ Raj Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present:- Mr. G.S. Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Joginder Pal Ratra, DAG, Punjab.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)
CRM No.24752 of 2020
Prayer in this application is for preponing the date fixed in
the main petition.
Heard.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the date fixed in the main petition is preponed for today. CRM-M No.783 of 2020
After arguing the matter for some time, counsel for the petitioner, finding that the Court is not inclined to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
| (ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE |
||
|---|---|---|
| 14.10.2020 | ||
| yakub | Whether speaking/rea | soned Yes/No |
| Whether reportable: | Yes/No |
MOHD YAKUB 2020.10.14 14:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Chhinder @ Chhindri @ Raj Singh
State of Punjab
Arvind Singh Sangwan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
