No substantive summary available. This order refers to a separate detailed order for reasons, without recording specific facts, arguments, or the operative decision of the bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-7593-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 4.11.2020
Satnam Singh … Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Mohinder Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rana Harjasdeep Singh, DAG, Punjab.
(Proceedings conducted through video conferencing)
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral)
For order, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of even date passed in CRM-M-21263-2020 Rajjinder Singh @ Raju Vs. State of Punjab.
November 4, 2020 ( GURVINDER SINGH GILL) mohan JUDGE Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
MOHAN SINGH 2020.11.05 09:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Satnam Singh
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
