Single judge allowed an application for permission to withdraw a main petition and permitted the withdrawal after the main case was taken up.
Permission to withdraw the main petition was allowed; the main case was permitted to be withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
CRM-16484-2020 IN/AND CRM-M No. 7238 of 2020 Date of Decision: 22.7.2020
Jaswinder Singh @ Toni
......Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present: Mr. Mandeep Singh, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner. ****
HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J. (ORAL)
Case is being taken up for hearing through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner has filed CRM16484-2020 seeking permission to withdraw the main petition, which is fixed for 29.9.2020.
Notice of the application.
On the asking of the Court, Mr. H.S.Sitta, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the State. He has no objection if the prayer of the learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner is allowed.
In view of the above, CRM-16484-2020 is allowed.
The main case is preponed for today and after taking the same on board, the same is permitted to be withdrawn.
(HARNARESH SINGH GILL) JUDGE
July 22, 2020 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
GURPREET SINGH 2020.07.22 14:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chadigarh
Jaswinder Singh @ Toni
State of Punjab
Harnaresh Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
