In this summary dismissal of an anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the Court refused to grant bail solely because the petitioner was found involved in six other criminal cases.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-52432 of 2019 Date of Decision: 31.01.2020
Sukha Singh alias Balvir Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:Mr. A.S. Mann, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pawan Sharda, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner – Sukha Singh alias Balvir Singh in case FIR No.193 dated 18.10.2019 registered under Section 61 of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 at Police Station Samana, District Patiala.
In view of statement of learned State counsel that petitioner has been found involved in six more criminal cases, instant petition is dismissed.
(RAMENDRA JAIN) January 31, 2020 JUDGE R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2020.02.03 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sukha Singh alias Balvir Singh
State of Punjab
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
