Petition dismissed as infructuous upon finding that petitioner had already been granted regular bail by the trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-4493 of 2020 Date of Decision: 11.08.2020
Dr. Ramesh Chaudhary
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:Mr. Rahil Mahajan, Advocate, for Mr. S.S. Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Beniwal, AAG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Case has been taken up for hearing through video-conferencing due to Covid-19 pandemic.
Learned State counsel contends that petitioner has already been granted regular bail by the trial Court. Therefore, instant petition has rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(RAMENDRA JAIN) August 11, 2020 JUDGE R.S. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2020.08.11 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Dr. Ramesh Chaudhary
State of Punjab
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
