Allowed

Gurpreet Singh Alias Ghoda v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC24 Jul 2020CRM-M/34871/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought regular bail in a criminal case. Court allowed the petition as the matter was compromised between parties. Petitioner ordered released on bail subject to furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Ambala.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered released on regular bail during pendency of trial, subject to furnishing bail bonds to satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Ambala.

Gurpreet Singh Alias Ghoda Vs State of Haryana — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2020)

¶1

-1-

¶2

Crl. Misc. No. M- 34871 of 2019

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

Crl. Misc. No. M- 34871 of 2019 (O&M) Date of decision :- 24.07.2020

¶5

Gurpreet Singh @ Ghoda

...Petitioner

versus

State of Haryana

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

¶11

Present: Mr. D.S. Matya, Advocate for the petitioner

¶12

Ms. Dimple Jain, A.A.G Haryana

¶13

Mr. Harinder Sharma, Advocate for the complainant

¶14

¶15

RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral)

¶16

Prayer in this petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, in a case arising out of FIR No.89 dated 25.02.2019, registered at Police Station Ambala City, District Ambala (P-1), who has been booked for having committed the offence punishable under Sections 285/323/336/379-B/34 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act ( now altered to Sections 323/365/367/397/34 IPC, vide amended charge sheet dated 24.09.2019 (A-1))

¶17

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter stands compromised between the parties. Reference has been made to affidavit of the complainant (A-1) wherein he stated that he has got no objection if the FIR be quashed qua all the accused person and they be granted regular bail.

¶18

GAURAV ARORA 2020.07.24 14:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶19

-2-

¶20

Crl. Misc. No. M- 34871 of 2019

¶21

Learned counsel for the complainant has not disputed the affidavit of the complainant (A-1).

¶22

Learned State counsel submits that out of 13 witnesses, 04 have been examined so far.

¶23

Heard.

¶24

Petitioner is in custody since 27.02.2019 and has undergone almost 01 year and 06 months.

¶25

Keeping in view the fact that the trial is likely to take some time to conclude and the fact that the matter stands compromised between the parties, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail during pendency of the trial of the present case, subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Ambala.

¶26

24.07.2020 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No

¶27

GAURAV ARORA 2020.07.24 14:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Gurpreet Singh Alias Ghoda v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurpreet Singh Alias Ghoda v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu Vs State of Haryana

Harbans Singh @ Kala Vs State of Punjab

Gurmail Singh Alias Gela Vs State of Punjab

Satgur Singh @ Sattu Vs State of Punjab

United India Insurance Company Limited Vs Ami Lal and Others

Paramjit Kaur through Her Attorney Inderjit Singh Vs Sukhwinder Kaur and Others