Petition under Section 213-A CrPC rendered infructuous due to the death of the petitioner, admitted by State counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRM-M No.26346 of 2020(O&M)
213-A
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.26346 of 2020(O&M) Date of Decision:07.09.2021
Saroj Dhir
......Petitioner
Vs
State of Punjab and another
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present:Mr. APS Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Bhupender Beniwal, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate for the complainant.
RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. (Oral)
The case has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has expired and this petition has become infructuous. This fact has been admitted by learned State counsel on instructions from investigating officer.
In view of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is rendered infructuous.
(RAJ MOHAN SINGH) 07.09.2021 JUDGE Prince
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2021.09.07 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Saroj Dhir
State of Punjab
Raj Mohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
