Allowed

Jatin Goyal and Anr. v. State of Punjab

Punjab & Haryana HC18 Dec 2020CRM-M/24935/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners seeking anticipatory bail for offences under IPC Sections 323 and 452/34 under FIR No.57 dated 2.4.2019 were granted protection earlier. On instructions, State counsel confirmed petitioners joined investigation and no longer required for custodial interrogation. Petition allowed with interim order made absolute.

What did the court decide?

Present petition allowed and interim order dated 28.8.2020 made absolute.

Jatin Goyal and Anr. Vs State of Punjab — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2020)

¶1

CRM-M-24935-2020 (O&M)

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶3

CRM-M-24935-2020 (O&M). Decided on: December 18, 2020.

¶4

Jatin Goyal and another

.. Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Punjab

.. Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI

¶11

¶12

PRESENT Mr.Jupinder Pal Singh Brar, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶13

Mr.Luvinder Sofat, AAG, Punjab.

¶14

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (ORAL)

¶15

The present petition has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.57 dated 2.4.2019, under Sections 323, 452/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Canal Colony, District Bathinda.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners were falsely implicated in the present case. He has further submitted that although the petitioners were named in the FIR but the FIR is based on the concocted story and complaint made by the complainant is

¶17

RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2020.12.18 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

¶19

CRM-M-24935-2020 (O&M)

¶20

baseless.

¶21

On 28.8.2020, notice of motion was issued by this Court and in the meanwhile, the petitioners were granted protection subject to their joining investigation and complying with the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

¶22

Today, learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Gursahib Singh, has stated that in the present case in pursuance of the order of this Court dated 28.8.2020, both the petitioners have joined investigation and have fully cooperated with the investigation process. He has further submitted that the petitioners are no longer required for custodial interrogation.

¶23

In view of above statement made by the learned State counsel, the present petition is allowed. Interim order dated 28.8.2020, is hereby made absolute.

¶24

December 18, 2020. (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) raj arora JUDGE

¶25

Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No

¶26

RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2020.12.18 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶27

Jatin Goyal and Anr. v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jatin Goyal and Anr. v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ikhlas Mahomad Vs State of Haryana and Others

Ikhlas Mahomad Vs State of Haryana

Chamkaur Singh and Others Vs State of Haryana and Another

Deepak Vs State of Haryana

Yograj Singh Alias Joga Vs State of Punjab

Manpreet Singh@ Meet Singh Vs State of Punjab