The Single Judge granted the petition for anticipatory bail, making prior interim directions absolute subject to the condition that the petitioner must appear, join the investigation, cooperate with the IO, and abide by Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C conditions.
Petition accepted; interim directions made absolute conditionally.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-22619-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 12.11.2020
Rajesh … Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Virender Mandhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Sheenu Sura, DAG, Haryana.
(Proceedings conducted through video conferencing)
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
MOHAN SINGH 2020.11.12 19:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-22619-2020 (O&M)
- 2 -
| November mohan |
12, 2020 | (GURVIN | DER SINGH GILL) JUDGE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking /reasoned | Yes / No | ||
| Whether Reportable | Yes / No |
MOHAN SINGH 2020.11.12 19:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for anticipatory bail sought in a case under Section 174-A IPC should be accepted and made absolute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajesh
State of Haryana
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
