Petition was withdrawn by learned counsel for the petitioner. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn under an oral order.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
107
CRM-M-21304-2020 (O & M) Date of Decision: July 31, 2020
RAVINDER SINGH DAHIYA AND ANR .... PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
.... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Present: Mr. Suresh K. Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner.
ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J (ORAL)
Heard through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition at this stage.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE
July 31, 2020 A.Kaundal Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
AMIT KAUNDAL 2020.07.31 13:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
6
Ravinder Singh Dahiya
State of Haryana
Anupinder Singh Grewal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
