Allowed

Gurnam Singh v. State of Punjab

Punjab & Haryana HC17 Sept 2020CRM-M/18249/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge oral order granting regular bail to the petitioner in a case involving Sections 323, 324, 379, 447, 511, 506, 148, 149 IPC. The court noted the case involved version and cross-version where both sides suffered injuries and co-accused were on bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on bail by furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court or Duty Magistrate.

Gurnam Singh Vs State of Punjab — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2020)

¶1

CRM-M No. 18249 of 2020

¶2

-1-

¶3

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

¶4

CRM-M No. 18249 of 2020 Date of Decision: 17.9.2020

Gurnam Singh

......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

......Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

¶11

Present: Mr. A.S.Manaise, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

Mr. Mehardeep Singh Dullat, Addl. A.G, Punjab.

¶13

¶14

HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J. (ORAL)

¶15

Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

¶16

The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No. 52 dated 27.5.2020 under Sections 323, 324, 379, 447, 511, 506, 148, 149 IPC (Section 326 IPC added later on), registered at Police Station Kahnuwan, District Gurdaspur.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been attributed a datar blow on the right leg of the complainant and even though the said injury falls under Section 326 IPC but the same has not been inflicted on the vital part of the body. He further submits that it is a case of version and cross-version and both the parties have suffered injuries and co-accused Lakshmi Saini, who is the sister-in-law of the petitioner, has received four injuries, out of which injury No. 3 has been declared grievous in nature. Similarly, co-accused Baljit Kaur, wife of the petitioner, has also received five injuries, out of which, injury No. 4 has been declared grievous GURPREET SINGH 2020.09.17 16:59 in nature. Learned counsel also submits that co-accused Lakshmi Saini and I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chadigarh

¶18

CRM-M No. 18249 of 2020 -2-

¶19

Baljit Kaur have been granted regular bail by the trial Court whereas coaccused Satnam Singh has been granted interim bail by this Court vide order dated 12.6.2020 (Annexure P-2) and the petitioner has been in custody since 26.5.2020.

¶20

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Prabh Dayal Singh, submits that in the present case, charges have been framed on 08.9.2020. However, he has not disputed the fact that it is a case of version and cross-version and the co-accused have also received injuries and that the petitioner has been attributed a datar blow on the right leg of the complainant.

¶21

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned State counsel.

¶22

It is a case of version and cross-version in which both the sides have received injuries. The petitioner has been attributed a dater blow on the right leg of the complainant which is a non-vital part. Moreover, two co-accused have been granted regular bail by the trial Court. The petitioner has been in custody since 26.5.2020. The trial will take time to conclude. No useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars.

¶23

Without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

¶24

(HARNARESH SINGH GILL) JUDGE

¶25

September	17, 2020
Gurpreet
	Whether speaking/reasoned	: Yes/No
	Whether reportable	: Yes/No

¶26

GURPREET SINGH 2020.09.17 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chadigarh

Gurnam Singh v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurnam Singh v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Paramjit Singh Vs State of Punjab

Harpreet Singh Vs State of Punjab

Money Kumar @ Mani @ Tatti Vs State of Punjab

Mamta and Others Vs State of Haryana and Another

Paramjit Singh @ Pamma Vs State of Punjab

Dishant Goel Vs U.T. of Chandigarh