In a criminal miscellaneous petition challenging an order, the petitioner was found innocent by police inquiry. The State counsel confirmed this, rendering the petition infructuous, which was consequently dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Criminal Misc. No. M- 154 of 2020
Date of Decision: 18.09. 2020
Gurjit Singh
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.
Present: Ms. Satinder Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Dhruv Dyal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent.
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
Mr. Dhruv Dyal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, on the instructions from Sub Inspector Lakhwinder Singh, has submitted that upon inquiry conducted by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dharamkot, the petitioner has been found innocent.
Keeping in view the aforesaid statement made by the learned State counsel, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and therefore, is dismissed as such.
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge
September 18, 2020 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2020.09.19 12:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Gurjit Singh
State of Punjab
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
