Petitioner requested to withdraw the petition intending to seek regular bail from the trial court. The High Court disposed of the matter as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
203
CRM-M-10500-2020 (O & M) Date of Decision: May 12, 2020
RAJU
..... PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA
.... RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Present: Mr. Roopak Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Chetan Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that he wants to withdraw this petition as the petitioner shall be preferring an application for regular bail before the trial Court.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE
May 12, 2020 A.Kaundal Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
AMIT KAUNDAL 2020.05.12 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
19
RAJU
STATE OF HARYANA
Anupinder Singh Grewal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
