This single-paragraph oral order finds the writ petition infructuous and dismisses it simultaneously disposing of pending applications. No detailed reasoning or substantive legal proposition is.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; pending applications disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
108
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CR No.8534 of 2016 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 22.07.2022
M/s Kuber Trading Company and Others …..Petitioners
versus
State Bank of Patiala .....Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Varsha Sharma, Advocate for
Mr. Lalit Singla, Advocate for the petitioners
..
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral):
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present petition has since been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
22.07.2022 (ALKA SARIN) parkash JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
PARKASH CHAND 2022.07.25 12:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
M/s Kuber Trading Company and Others
State Bank of Patiala
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
