A contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 was dismissed as it became infructuous after the petitioner stated that the impugned order had been complied with.
No relief was granted. The petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
211 COCP-1294-2020(O&M) Date of decision : 22.09.2020
Sushil Kaur
...Petitioner
Versus
Seema and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN
Present: Mr. Sartaj Singh Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Aditya Sharda, A.A.G., Punjab.
JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. (Oral)
The matter has been taken up through video-conferencing in the light of the pandemic COVID-19 situation and as per instructions.
This Contempt petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 has been filed for initiating contempt proceedings against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order dated 22.11.2019 (Annexure P-1) passed in CWP No. 34028 of 2019 titled as Sushil Kaur Versus State of Punjab and others.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has been appointed, as such, the order dated 22.11.2019 stands complied with.
In view of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, no cause of action survives and the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
| 22.09.2020 | (JITE | NDRA CHAUHAN) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jyoti-II | JUDGE | ||
| Whether speaking / reasoned : | Yes | No | |
| Whether Reportable : | Yes | No |
JYOTI 2020.09.22 04:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sushil Kaur
Seema
Jitendra Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
