Joginder Pal v. Ashok Kumar Kohli
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was dismissed as it had been rendered infructuous. A speaking order was not rendered.
The appeal was dismissed as it had been rendered infructuous. A speaking order was not rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SAO No.49 of 2019 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.10.2019
Joginder Pal
......Appellant
versus
Ashok Kumar Kohli
......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: - Ms. Kanchan, Advocate, for Mr. A.K. Khubbar, Advocate, for the appellant.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the appellant prays that she may be allowed to withdraw this appeal as the same has rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as withdrawn having been rendered infructuous.
(Ramendra Jain) October 29, 2019 Judge R.S. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2019.10.30 14:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Joginder Pal
Ashok Kumar Kohli
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court