Rattan Pal Singh and Anr. v. Karnail Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.4012 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision.13.03.2019
Rattanpal Singh and another ...Appellants
Vs
Karnail Singh ...Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. S.D. Bansal, Advocate for the respondents.
-.-
AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)
After arguing at some length, both the counsel on instructions from their respective clients are ad idem that parties, being real brothers, are willing to arrive at a compromise and their statements in this regard may be recorded.
The respondent-plaintiff is willing to purchase the property at Collector rate, which is accepted by the appellantdefendant.
Statements of both parties are recorded and the same be formed as part of the record.
In view of statements made by parties, judgments and decrees of the Courts below are modified and the appeal is disposed of, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE
March 13, 2019 Pankaj* Whether Reasoned/Speaking Yes Whether Reportable No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.03.18 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Rattanpal Singh and another
Karnail Singh
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court