(O&M) Amrik Singh Jeji v. Bhupinder Kaur
Case brief
What is this about?
In a regular second appeal challenging a suit for possession and mesne profit, the High Court dismissed the appeal as the lower courts correctly disregarded the defendant's claim of adverse possession given his minor age at the time of alleged dispossession.
What did the court decide?
Dismissed the regular second appeal and upheld the concurrent findings of fact and the decree of the suit for possession.
What the court decided
-1-
RSA No.3329 of 2007 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.3329 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Order:18.03.2019
Amrik Singh
..Appellant
Versus
Bhupinder Kaur
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present: Mr. Manish Kumar Singla, Advocate and Ms. Shikha Singla, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Girish Agnihotri, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate, and Mr. Ishaan Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the respondent.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the lower courts misread the evidence regarding adverse possession and the defendant's age at the time of dispossession.
Whether the pending application for amendment of written statement warrants interference with the concurrent findings of fact.
Whether there are sufficient grounds to set aside the decree decreeing the suit for possession.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Amrik Singh
- respondent
Bhupinder Kaur
Coram
Anil Kshetrapal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/3329/2007
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court