Order in Regular Second Appeal RSA 2184 of 2001 where the court directed parties to refer to the order of even date passed in Appeal No.1685 of 2002, Chhaju Ram vs. Surjit Kaur.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.2184 of 2001(O&M) Date of Order: 20.03.2019
Harbans Singh and others ..Appellants
Versus
Chhaju Ram ..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate, for the appellants
Mr. S.S.Khaira, Advocate, for the respondent
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J(Oral)
For orders, see order of even date passed in Regular Second
Appeal No.1685 of 2002 titled as Chhaju Ram vs. Surjit Kaur.
March 20, 2019 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) nt JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
NARESH KUMAR 2019.03.27 14:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Appeal No.1685 of 2002 titled as Chhaju Ram vs. Surjit KaurReferred¶11
Harbans Singh and others
Chhaju Ram
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
