A brief, one-paragraph order where the High Court allowed an appeal based on a detailed judgment passed on the same date in a related matter, RFA No.684 of 2012.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.7344 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on : 15.11.2019
Raj Mal and another
.... Appellant(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others
.... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present : Mr. S.P. Khatri, Advocate, Mr. Anil Dutt, Advocate and Mr. Rahul Vats, Advocate for the landowners.
Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Addl. AG, Haryana. Ms. Vibha Tiwari, AAG, Haryana.
G.S. Sandhawalia, J. (Oral)
The appeal is allowed in terms of the detailed judgment of
even date passed in RFA No.684 of 2012 titled as “ Smt. Brijesh and
another Vs. State of Haryan through Collector, Sonepat and others ”.
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) NOVEMBER 15, 2019 JUDGE Parveen Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
PARVEEN KUMAR 2019.11.29 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Smt. Brijesh and another Vs. State of Haryana through Collector, Sonepat and othersFollowed¶13
RFA No.684 of 2012
Raj Mal
State of Haryana
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
