The appeal is allowed by order without a speaking judgment, relying on a detailed judgment passed on the same date in a sister case. The case is remanded for a fresh decision.
Case remanded for fresh decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.4048 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision:16.12.2019
Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation
....Appellant(s)
Versus
Lekh Ram and others ....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Advocate and Ms. Manjit Saini, Advocate, for the HSIIDC.
Mr. B.K. Bagri, Advocate, Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, Advocate for Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Sidharath Goyal, Advocate, Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. R.D. Yadav, Advocate, Mr. Balraj Gujjar, Advocate, Mr. Gulshan Nandwani, Advocate Mr. Gaurav Aggarwal, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Advocate Mr. Gaurav Khokhar, Advocate for Mr. S.K. Aggarwal, Advocate Mr. Amrit Singh, Advocate for Mr. P.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for the landowners.
Ms. Vibha Tiwari, AAG, Haryana.
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
The appeal is allowed in terms of detailed judgment of even date
passed in RFA No.3146 of 2019 titled as “Haryana State Industrial and
Infrastructure Development Corporation Vs. Teshi and others ” and the case
is remanded for fresh decision.
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) 16.12.2019 JUDGE
Parveen Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PARVEEN KUMAR 2019.12.20 11:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc
Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation
Lekh Ram
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
