High Court allowed the appeal relying on a detailed judgment dated on the same date. Court denied interest on enhanced compensation for 1078 days delay based on an earlier order dated 15.11.2019.
Enhanced compensation awarded; interest on 1078 days delay denied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RFA No.3510 of 2019 (O&M)
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.3510 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision:22.11.2019
Tej Singh
....Appellant(s)
Versus
The Land Acquisition Collector and others ....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
| Present: | Mr. Pawan Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surya Kumar, Advocate, |
|---|---|
| Mr. Anshuman Mandhar, Advocate and | |
| Mr. Mandeep S. Bedi, Senior Advocate with | |
| Mr. Sidhant Nehra, Advocate, |
|
| Mr. Rajat Garg, Advocate for | |
| Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate, | |
| Mr. Sanjay Vij, Advocate, | |
| Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate, | |
| Mr. Harsh Bunger, Advocate, | |
| Mr. Udit Garg, Advocate, | |
| Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Advocate for | |
| Mr. Saurabh Arora, Advocate, | |
| Ms. Nitika Sharma, Advocate for | |
| Mr. Aashish Chopra, Advocate, | |
| Mr. Suresh Kumar Kaushik, Advocate, | |
| Mr. Sonu Giri, Advocate for | |
| Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, | |
| Mr. Atul Yadav, Advocate, | |
| Mr. Rohit Sud, Advocate, | |
| Ms. Monika Singh, Advocate for | |
| Mr. Amit Kumar Jain, Advocate | |
| Mr. Harshit Anand, Advocate for | |
| Mr. Shekhar Verma, Advocate, | |
| Mr. Munfaid Khan, Advocate, | |
| Mr. J.L. Malhotra, Advocate, | |
| Mr. Akash Sridhar, Advocate for | |
| Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate, | |
| Mr. Ashok Tyagi, Advocate, | |
| Mr. J.S. Saneta, Advocate, | |
| Mr. Rishabh Goel, Advocate for | |
| Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate, | |
| Mr. Rajni Kant, Advocate for | |
| Mr. Rakesh Dhiman, Advocate, | |
| Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate, | |
| Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate | |
| R |
for the landowners. |
PARVEEN KUMAR 2019.12.06 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc
RFA No.3510 of 2019 (O&M)
2
Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Addl. A.G., Haryana with Mr. Abhinash Jain, AAG, Haryana.
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J.
The appeal is allowed in terms of the detailed judgment of even
date passed in RFA No.2129 of 2013 titled as “ Jaggan and others Vs. State of Haryana and others .”
However, in view of earlier order dated 15.11.2019, the appellant(s) shall not be entitled to interest on the enhanced compensation for the period of delay of 1078 days.
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) 22.11.2019 JUDGE
Parveen
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PARVEEN KUMAR 2019.12.06 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant is entitled to interest on enhanced compensation.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jaggan and others Vs. State of Haryana and othersRelied on¶17
Jaggan and others Vs. State of Haryana and others
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tej Singh
The Land Acquisition Collector and others
G.S. Sandhawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
