Single judge order disposing an appeal by decision under another even-date judgment, denying interest on enhanced compensation for a delay period of 2800 days.
Decision in terms of RFA No.2624 of 2019 with denial of interest on delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.2732 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision:17.12.2019
Gian Devi (deceased) through her LRs
....Appellant(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others ....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. J.K. Singla, Advocate for the appellant(s).
Ms. Ambika Bedi, AAG, Punjab for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
None for respondent No.3-Mandi Board.
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
The appeal is disposed off in terms of detailed judgment of even date passed in RFA No.2624 of 2019 titled as “ Darshan Pal Vs. State of
Punjab and others ”.
However, the appellant(s) shall not be entitled to interest on the
enhanced compensation for the period of delay of 2800 days.
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) 17.12.2019 JUDGE Parveen Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PARVEEN KUMAR 2019.12.23 11:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant is entitled to interest on enhanced compensation for the period of delay.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Darshan Pal Vs. State of Punjab and othersReferred¶13
RFA No.2624 of 2019
Gian Devi (deceased) through her LRs
State of Punjab and others
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
