The appeal was dismissed without any detailed reasoning, relying entirely on a separate judgment passed on the same date. No substantive legal proposition is ascertainable from this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.2711 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision:22.11.2019
M/s BTVS Buildwell Private Limited
....Appellant(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and another ....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Pawan Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surya Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Sanjay Vij, Advocate, Mr. Navneet Singh, Advocate, Mr. Shekhar Verma, Advocate, Mr. P.R. Yadav, Advocate for the landowners.
Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Addl. A.G., Haryana with Mr. Abhinash Jain, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Rajnikant Upadhay, Advocate for Mr. Rakesh Dhiman, Advocate for the cross-objectors (in XOBJR-68-CI-2014). *****
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J.
The appeal is dismissed in terms of the detailed judgment of even
date passed in RFA No.4267 of 2014 titled as “ State of Haryana and another
Vs. M/s. BTVS Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. ”
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) 22.11.2019 JUDGE Parveen Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PARVEEN KUMAR 2019.12.07 11:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc
M/s BTVS Buildwell Private Limited
State of Haryana
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
