The High Court dismissed the RFA for non-prosecution as no representation was filed on behalf of the appellant, and the position remained unchanged from the previous date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.2251 of 1987 Date of decision:21.01.2019
Gram Panchayat, Dundahera
... Appellant
Vs.
Hoshiar Singh (since deceased) through LRs and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:None.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Position
was not different on the previous date i.e. 28.01.2015.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE January 21, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
SAVITA KADIAN 2019.01.23 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Gram Panchayat, Dundahera
Hoshiar Singh through LRs
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
